Skip to main content

Peer-Reviewed Journal Article

While searching the AOTA website for journal articles about occupational therapy and the group process, I found an article that stood out to me. The article I chose was on the benefits of group occupational therapy for patients with Parkinson's disease. All participants in the study had been diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. The volunteers were randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group received group occupational therapy for 10 sessions with a duration of 2 hours. Both groups were also followed medically. The outcomes included functional autonomy, dexterity, patients' impressions, physical and motor signs, and behavioral changes.

The group intervention sessions followed the pattern of:

  1. Arrival (welcome and socialization)
  2. General mobility activities
  3. Rest period and socialization 
  4. Dexterity activities
  5. Functional activities
  6. Educational activities
  7. Departure (informal exchange and socialization)
The results showed that the intervention group maintained their functional status over 1 year, whereas the control group showed a decrease of their independence with the progression of the disease. At 6 months, the intervention group showed diminishing of bradykinesia and akathisia. Also, observations showed better quality of life, socialization, and family interaction in the intervention group.

What I liked most about this article were the outcomes chosen in the study; both physical and psychological outcomes were tested. Most interesting to me were the results involving the psychological outcomes. The intervention group showed improvement in their socialization, quality of life, perception of disease, and other factors. I have heard over and over from professors that mental health is involved in any case and this article helped make that more clear to me. Often times, mental health may not be the focus of intervention for patients with Parkinson's but this article is evidence that it is an important aspect. 

The article shows that groups can be beneficial for people with similar diagnoses. People are able to share insight about their conditions and socialize with people similar to them. I like that in the group sessions provided multiple opportunities for socialization throughout. 

In conclusion, I think this article is good evidence of the benefits of group occupational therapy with patients with Parkinson's disease and beyond. I look forward to using the group process in my future career as an occupational therapist. 


Guthier, L., Dalziel, S., and Gauthier, S. (1987). The benefits of group occupational therapy for patient's with Parkinson's disease. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41(6), 360-365.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post Challenge 5: Clinical Reasoning

“Clinical reasoning enables practitioners to •     Identify the multiple demands, required skills, and potential meanings of the activities and occupations and 
 •     Gain a deeper understanding of the interrelationships between aspects of the domain that affect performance and that support client-centered interventions and outcomes.” – OTPF An integral part of the OT process is using clinical reasoning. As discussed in class, acquiring the skill can take time as an OT. It is something for us, as students, to remember as we travel through the program. We have opportunities through fieldwork and RKS to not only watch experienced practitioners use clinical reasoning, but to practice and mold our own clinical reasoning.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Reflection #1 "Think Happy Thoughts"

Yesterday, Virginia and I led a group session about cultivating a positive attitude we named, "Think Happy Thoughts." I then used the exercise provided in our groups book to lead my reflection on the experience of our facilitation. Although nervous to lead the group, I feel that we did a great job engaging the group members. We led off with a warm-up activity where the group members could state how positive/negative they felt at the moment. I think this was a good way to start the group because it was Monday morning and many of us were feeling negative about the upcoming week. The warm-up prepared the group for the session and allowed them to get their feelings out about the upcoming week. I think the activity we chose was good in facilitating the group goals. Because the group members were my classmates, I found it difficult to know how involved to be in the activity. I think it will be interesting to lead my first client group and compare the differences of facilitation b...
Post a Comment
Read more

12-Step Meeting

After attending a 12-step meeting, I can see how it is beneficial to my learning of the group process. In this particular meeting, I felt the leader took on more of an advisory role because he was a passive leader and did not provide a lot of structure to the group. The group session was more of an open discussion. He led the group off by asking what everyone wanted to talk about that day which encouraged group members to participate. I think it was a good way to get started and allow the group to guide the session. I think because the environment was a nice, quiet, church building, maybe members were more comfortable. There weren't any distractions such as traffic or hallway noises which I think helped the focus of the members. I think this group session was therapeutic because the members were able to talk about their feelings in an open format, and I think any time someone shares their thoughts or feelings it is therapeutic. I did reflect on maybe some differences if this were...
1 comment
Read more